<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Valencia Street Squeaks Onto Chronicle List of 25 Deadliest Roads for Cyclists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmission.org/2008/03/16/valencia-street-squeaks-onto-chronicle-list-of-25-deadliest-roads-for-cyclists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2008/03/16/valencia-street-squeaks-onto-chronicle-list-of-25-deadliest-roads-for-cyclists/</link>
	<description>Saluting San Francisco&#039;s Mission District</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 13:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking News: Fire Hydrant Geyser at 21st and Valencia (Video) &#171; Mission Mission</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2008/03/16/valencia-street-squeaks-onto-chronicle-list-of-25-deadliest-roads-for-cyclists/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking News: Fire Hydrant Geyser at 21st and Valencia (Video) &#171; Mission Mission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Valencia Street Squeaks onto Chronicle List of 25 Deadliest Roads for Cyclists [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Valencia Street Squeaks onto Chronicle List of 25 Deadliest Roads for Cyclists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Construction Camp on V-Street &#171; Mission Mission</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2008/03/16/valencia-street-squeaks-onto-chronicle-list-of-25-deadliest-roads-for-cyclists/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Construction Camp on V-Street &#171; Mission Mission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 22:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Camp on&#160;V-Street   Valencia Street is a dangerous place, more or less. We&#8217;ve all heard the debate: are there so many bike accidents on Valencia and Market because they are such dangerous (bad) bike [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Camp on&nbsp;V-Street   Valencia Street is a dangerous place, more or less. We&#8217;ve all heard the debate: are there so many bike accidents on Valencia and Market because they are such dangerous (bad) bike [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2008/03/16/valencia-street-squeaks-onto-chronicle-list-of-25-deadliest-roads-for-cyclists/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 05:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this chart yesterday. This morning after a good night&#039;s rest, I was thinking about it, and I&#039;ve concluded that it&#039;s misleading.  I don&#039;t know that &quot;most dangerous&quot; is the right way to characterize those roads.  They have the most bike accidents, but it seems likely that that&#039;s because they have the most bike traffic.  These are major bike routes.  Of course a road with 100 times as many bikes is going to have more accidents involving bikes.  Of course the bike fatalities are going to happen where there are bikes all the time.  What I&#039;d like to see is some sort of ratio of accidents to bicycle volume.  It&#039;s certainly safer to ride on Polk (#8) than Van Ness, which doesn&#039;t make the list because it&#039;s so much more dangerous that almost every cyclist takes Polk instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this chart yesterday. This morning after a good night&#8217;s rest, I was thinking about it, and I&#8217;ve concluded that it&#8217;s misleading.  I don&#8217;t know that &#8220;most dangerous&#8221; is the right way to characterize those roads.  They have the most bike accidents, but it seems likely that that&#8217;s because they have the most bike traffic.  These are major bike routes.  Of course a road with 100 times as many bikes is going to have more accidents involving bikes.  Of course the bike fatalities are going to happen where there are bikes all the time.  What I&#8217;d like to see is some sort of ratio of accidents to bicycle volume.  It&#8217;s certainly safer to ride on Polk (#8) than Van Ness, which doesn&#8217;t make the list because it&#8217;s so much more dangerous that almost every cyclist takes Polk instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
