Comments on: UK Bans American Apparel Ad (NSFW) http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/ Saluting San Francisco's Mission District Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:29:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Vincent http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-96386 Vincent Fri, 22 Nov 2013 06:26:05 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-96386 Are you people kidding me? Hell they show a girls tits on a mag and omg all hell is breaking loose. Yet there is tits on tv in the uk…? Hell, i see more nudity in high schools and colleges then i do here. All they are doing is being honest. Its only the moms that are complaining. The kids are wearing it. Now you can say that this is to blame why we have 19 year olds in college with just a hoody and high heels on with nothing under neath. But before AA even started making mags like this there were GIRLs as in 13 and 14 year old that would come with just a t on. Come on guys the world is changing stop crying and just except that the world will never be all roses and weed like it was. Yeah I know all about the 60 – 90.

]]> By: Humber Humbert http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-30485 Humber Humbert Sun, 03 Apr 2011 08:41:23 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-30485 Pfff
I can’t say I have ever encountered any ‘children’ who look like that. I have though come across many adult women who look like that (hmm, maybe because this IS an adult woman?)

adult woman ≠ child
not being a cookie-cutter buxom babe ≠ child porn

C’mon UK, getcha lolitas straight.

]]> By: bill http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-29579 bill Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:41:41 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-29579 If the female in this ad was 18 yrs old, with big breasts, and a face full of makeup, instead of 23 looking like “Plain Jane”, the UK would have no problem at all with it. See Page 3.

]]> By: Andy http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-10490 Andy Wed, 19 May 2010 00:27:22 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-10490 I don’t get it, how does this model look like a little girl?

Is your opinion like the recent Australian ban on naked women with small breats because small breasts are somehow “childish”? kinda lame.

Sure… school girl fetish weird shit, I get that. But a early 20-something in a hoodie? what?

]]> By: Hannah http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-10489 Hannah Mon, 03 May 2010 18:00:57 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-10489 I completely agree with the UK banning this ad. I would never ever buy anything from American Apparel because of their repulsive pedophellic ad campaigns. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that all of his models “look” like children being sexualized. The owner of American Apparel is so bloody creepy!!!! It’s really too bad, because his initial ideas about the way he would like to run his business were very admirable.

]]> By: mamiel http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-10488 mamiel Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:56:41 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-10488 The American Apparel ads remnd me of that creepy scene in the movie “Fame” When that girl (Irene something?) is auditioning for a “part” and some creepy guy makes her take off her clothes and she ends up in tears.

]]> By: Soledad Dolores http://www.missionmission.org/2009/09/02/uk-bans-american-apparel-ad-nsfw/#comment-10487 Soledad Dolores Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:03:25 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=6662#comment-10487 america is terrible. it makes me sad. i’ll never hold a young woman that fresh again.

]]>