Comments on: Enough Banksy for Chu? http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/ Saluting San Francisco's Mission District Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:29:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Blogs Search Engine http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-63145 Blogs Search Engine Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:33:44 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-63145 Blogs Search Engine…

Blogs Search Engine…

]]> By: Banksy Does Way Radder Stuff in LA « Mission Mission http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18684 Banksy Does Way Radder Stuff in LA « Mission Mission Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:32:31 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18684 [...] that I didn’t appreciate the stuff he did here. But this billboard liberation is just utterly [...]

]]> By: Dan Walsh http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18683 Dan Walsh Wed, 12 May 2010 19:44:08 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18683 Some pretty good close ups of this stencil here: http://dontcallmeanartist.com/?p=48

]]> By: jonstarbuck http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18682 jonstarbuck Fri, 07 May 2010 04:49:13 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18682 Frank was not there this afternoon, Thurs 5th. It is either a prank or temporary, either way I liked it.

]]> By: Kevin http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18681 Kevin Thu, 06 May 2010 01:50:40 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18681 Has anyone discovered whether this is real or Photoshop prank yet?

]]> By: Soledad Dolores http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18680 Soledad Dolores Tue, 04 May 2010 22:23:32 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18680 im sad you are all so dumb

]]> By: Evan http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18679 Evan Tue, 04 May 2010 20:28:23 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18679 I, for one, think this is awesome. Even if the face is backwards. Banksy is just a tagger, and this wave of tags is just a commercial promo series. I’m a huge fan, but if he wants to advertise, he should do so legally. If he wants to be a street artist and a tagger, then he just got one-upped by a local. Win.

]]> By: suckerpunch http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18678 suckerpunch Tue, 04 May 2010 19:03:05 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18678 It’s art second, graffiti first. Which is to say, being overwritten, changed, painted over, etc… is all part of the scene.
Lot’s of people might complain about what has/will happen to this piece, telling is that you’ll never hear Banksy do it though.

]]> By: Andrew Sarkarati http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18677 Andrew Sarkarati Tue, 04 May 2010 18:17:25 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18677 hey!

]]> By: Soma Troll http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18676 Soma Troll Tue, 04 May 2010 18:17:10 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18676 Um, this is NOT lame. Banksy is rad, but this is really self promotional for the movie. (taggers get tagged, part of the game). I enjoy how this makes the post SF specific, and the meta narrative created in the juxtoposition of the two pieces is pretty rad. I agree that the sign is not Chu enough, but maybe more metalayers will begin to appear.

]]> By: C. http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18675 C. Tue, 04 May 2010 17:46:24 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18675 That sign is not Frank. It lacks terminological authenticity of trans-galatic reference. It also refers directly to Frank – and to Banksy – by earth-names. It seems both squidish and shoppish. It might also be sarkaratastic.

]]> By: GP http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18674 GP Tue, 04 May 2010 16:40:40 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18674 Fuck this. How lame is it to turn a piece of art into a one time laugh.

]]> By: Jeff http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/enough-banksy-for-chu/#comment-18673 Jeff Tue, 04 May 2010 15:45:18 +0000 http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13820#comment-18673 What a crappy defacing (refacing?) though! Would look great if Frank’s face was mirrored horizontally.

]]>