<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Amendment Would Potentially Allow Any Event Permit to Be Appealed by Any Member of the Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/</link>
	<description>Saluting San Francisco&#039;s Mission District</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:29:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aparthied in SF Parks</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-36973</link>
		<dc:creator>Aparthied in SF Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-36973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Susan. I am about to do battle with Dana Ketchum of sf parks  Any ideas?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Susan. I am about to do battle with Dana Ketchum of sf parks  Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protesting Protesters, Part 2 &#187; Dolores Park Works</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20190</link>
		<dc:creator>Protesting Protesters, Part 2 &#187; Dolores Park Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 16:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Committee meeting at City Hall. We, like it seems all event producers, received a very alarming email from Dana Ketchum of RPD permitting office that there was a proposed amendment that would allow [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Committee meeting at City Hall. We, like it seems all event producers, received a very alarming email from Dana Ketchum of RPD permitting office that there was a proposed amendment that would allow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Dumont</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20189</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Dumont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Ginsburg, Rec &amp; Parks general manager, denied knowing about the over-the-top scare tactic memo from his dept. which dragged out event people on Friday for no reason. Just one indicator of how Rec &amp; Parks works...either in disarray or with deception. Rec &amp; Parks claim that donors won&#039;t give to a dept. that seeks balance, transparency and is more responsive to the people is very insulting to all. We need to take back OUR parks from a small group of Newsom appointed insiders who vote in unison so frequently that they sometimes don&#039;t bother to ask for the &quot;nay&quot; votes! Their goal is to commercialize and privatize our parks. Any San Franciscan knows that a commission voting in unison nearly 95% of the time is not representing the diversity of San Francisco. The Mirkarimi Rec &amp; Parks Charter Amendment would provide balance, transparency and respect for park users that is sorely missing with the current Commission. Vote yes in Nov. to save our parks from privatization.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ginsburg, Rec &amp; Parks general manager, denied knowing about the over-the-top scare tactic memo from his dept. which dragged out event people on Friday for no reason. Just one indicator of how Rec &amp; Parks works&#8230;either in disarray or with deception. Rec &amp; Parks claim that donors won&#8217;t give to a dept. that seeks balance, transparency and is more responsive to the people is very insulting to all. We need to take back OUR parks from a small group of Newsom appointed insiders who vote in unison so frequently that they sometimes don&#8217;t bother to ask for the &#8220;nay&#8221; votes! Their goal is to commercialize and privatize our parks. Any San Franciscan knows that a commission voting in unison nearly 95% of the time is not representing the diversity of San Francisco. The Mirkarimi Rec &amp; Parks Charter Amendment would provide balance, transparency and respect for park users that is sorely missing with the current Commission. Vote yes in Nov. to save our parks from privatization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Happened With That Controversial Event Permit Proposal? &#171; Mission Mission</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20188</link>
		<dc:creator>What Happened With That Controversial Event Permit Proposal? &#171; Mission Mission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 01:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This Amendment Would Potentially Allow Any Event Permit to be Appealed by Any Member of the Public Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)A Timeline of Permit PurgatoryPolice investigates Ayumi Hamasaki?Thune Would Make Carry Permits Valid Across the Nation – HUMAN EVENTS          Explore posts in the same categories: News [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This Amendment Would Potentially Allow Any Event Permit to be Appealed by Any Member of the Public Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)A Timeline of Permit PurgatoryPolice investigates Ayumi Hamasaki?Thune Would Make Carry Permits Valid Across the Nation – HUMAN EVENTS          Explore posts in the same categories: News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rigo</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20187</link>
		<dc:creator>Rigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, though you guys might be interested in how this thing turned out.

http://missionlocal.org/2010/06/event-organizers-spoils-appeal-process-ammendment/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, though you guys might be interested in how this thing turned out.</p>
<p><a href="http://missionlocal.org/2010/06/event-organizers-spoils-appeal-process-ammendment/" rel="nofollow">http://missionlocal.org/2010/06/event-organizers-spoils-appeal-process-ammendment/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Event Organizers, Spoils Appeal Process Ammendment &#8211; Mission Loc@l -- San Francisco Mission District's News, Food, Art and Events</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20186</link>
		<dc:creator>Event Organizers, Spoils Appeal Process Ammendment &#8211; Mission Loc@l -- San Francisco Mission District's News, Food, Art and Events</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 23:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that anyone in Rec and Park sent out the email. But some event organizers held it in hand and the Mission Mission blog posted it on Thursday.  The email appears to have been sent by Dana Ketcham, manager of Permits and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that anyone in Rec and Park sent out the email. But some event organizers held it in hand and the Mission Mission blog posted it on Thursday.  The email appears to have been sent by Dana Ketcham, manager of Permits and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protesting Protesters &#187; Dolores Park Works</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20185</link>
		<dc:creator>Protesting Protesters &#187; Dolores Park Works</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] off to protest this B.S. Follow updates on Twitter if it ever comes back online. I supposed it&#8217;s good to be [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] off to protest this B.S. Follow updates on Twitter if it ever comes back online. I supposed it&#8217;s good to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEricSir</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/06/17/this-amendment-would-potentially-allow-any-event-permit-to-be-appealed-by-any-member-of-the-public/#comment-20184</link>
		<dc:creator>MrEricSir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=15168#comment-20184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#039;t you ever been to these meetings?  This is no different from how it works now in San Francisco.

Every meeting, some loudmouth asshole gets up and starts yelling at the top of his lungs about how this plan/event/whatever is ruining his life and yeah it only cost him ten cents but it&#039;s the principal of the thing, BLAH BLAH BLAH.

Then the community &quot;leaders&quot; let him dominate the entire discussion because they don&#039;t have the balls to tell him to shut up or throw him out.

tl;dr: NIMBYS ruin shit in SF.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t you ever been to these meetings?  This is no different from how it works now in San Francisco.</p>
<p>Every meeting, some loudmouth asshole gets up and starts yelling at the top of his lungs about how this plan/event/whatever is ruining his life and yeah it only cost him ten cents but it&#8217;s the principal of the thing, BLAH BLAH BLAH.</p>
<p>Then the community &#8220;leaders&#8221; let him dominate the entire discussion because they don&#8217;t have the balls to tell him to shut up or throw him out.</p>
<p>tl;dr: NIMBYS ruin shit in SF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
