http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/ Saluting San Francisco's Mission District Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:29:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31733 olu Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:46:21 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31733 i still don’t understand why you couldn’t have told the bartenders.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31695 Allan Hough Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:01:30 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31695 Not a save. Go fuck yourself.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31693 Moosetag Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:13:07 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31693 i’m still in love with AttF’s comments

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31690 Tanya Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:38:08 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31690 Great save. Props.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31659 Allan Hough Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:37:12 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31659 No.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31658 Allan Hough Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:37:03 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31658 No, I was mortified. That I was at the same establishment as that tool, and thus apparently have at least some overlapping tastes or interests.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31657 Tanya Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:36:45 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31657 Horrified is probably what you meant.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31656 Tanya Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:34:48 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31656 Mortified means embarrassed. I think you probably meant outraged, or scandalized, or something else.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31651 SCUM Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:14:35 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31651 This has become a nation of wimps.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31650 Stu Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:05:53 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31650 “Most people in this City cower if you call them out on anything publicly”?. Are you a Mission resident, sir?

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31646 Cranky Old Mission Guy Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:32:08 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31646 Vas you dere, Cholly?

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31645 Skids the Clown Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:22:11 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31645 You have to much time bro

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31643 SCUM Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:15:21 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31643 Alcohol kills germs.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31638 AttF Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:55:21 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31638 no, it’s extremely passive aggressive and I doubt that self-preservation was a concern in this scenario. San Franciscans who drink fancy cocktails aren’t likely to engage you in a bar fight, especially in a situation where the bar staff would have backed you up. In fact, most people in this City cower if you call them out on anything publicly. Direct communication counts for a lot….just sayin’.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/25/fruit-handler/#comment-31637 Cranky Old Mission Guy Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:42:28 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26401#comment-31637 That’s not “Passive Aggressive” — that’s self-preservation.

]]>