http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/ Saluting San Francisco's Mission District Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:29:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-36019 Jenkings Fri, 08 Jul 2011 18:19:52 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-36019 You think this is a news site?

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35980 GG Thu, 07 Jul 2011 19:50:09 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35980 I have two dogs and, until recently, a cat. You have to be willing to pay above-market rent and spend a lot of time looking. Of course, she could have been walking the dogs for her dog-walking business or something.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35973 Jane Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:42:56 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35973 Of course my first thought was, where are these mystical rental properties that allow these people to have multiple dogs? …as half my friends go to absurd efforts to conceal cats from their overzealous landlords.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35970 SuperLesbian Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:38:53 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35970 lol^ You read my mind.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35964 Delegate Nerd Thu, 07 Jul 2011 18:20:36 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35964 Oh, oops, I think I was getting the photo confused with the dialogue.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35960 Pedro Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:21:50 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35960 So many things wrong with this dude’s way of thinking. Solution based thinking?

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35958 GG Thu, 07 Jul 2011 17:12:57 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35958 They were in their early 20s, looked like college girls.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35950 Swish Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:54:32 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35950 The girls show affection for each other.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35948 nickh Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:20:18 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35948 Where the hell is that guys arm? Maybe this should be cross posted on photoshop disasters.

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35936 GG Thu, 07 Jul 2011 05:48:38 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35936 That girl on the left is pretty cute. I would have been OK with your attributing her photo to me (not pictured).

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35934 Delegate Nerd Thu, 07 Jul 2011 05:44:00 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35934 This is good dialogue, kind of like Days of Our Lives only with SF yuppies in their early 40′s…

]]> http://www.missionmission.org/2011/07/06/double-standards-in-relationships/#comment-35914 Glenparker Thu, 07 Jul 2011 03:12:27 +0000 http://www.missionmission.org/?p=29659#comment-35914 Extremely slow news day?

]]>