Comments on: Drone’s-eye view of Dolores Park

By: Vernon Schleisman

Vernon Schleisman — Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:14:36 +0000

I’ve read several just right stuff here. Definitely price bookmarking
for revisiting. I surprise how so much attempt you put to create this type of excellent informative
web site.

By: Erna Patenaude

Erna Patenaude — Fri, 06 Sep 2013 02:22:03 +0000

Wow, awesome weblog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
you made blogging glance easy. The full look of
your site is fantastic, let alone the content material!

By: biglippedkneegro

biglippedkneegro — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:08:33 +0000

created by niggerfilms.com?…….nice

By: Pickles

Pickles — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:23:03 +0000

If yer gonna be a pro, act like one.

By: Derek

Derek — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:32:55 +0000

This is even worse than inappropriate ball/frisbee throwing in the park.

By: Escobar 92

Escobar 92 — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:08:45 +0000

Yep, not cool.

By: Escobar 92

Escobar 92 — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:06:46 +0000

They’re legal and in 2 years they sky will be full of them.

By: Pickles

Pickles — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:53:10 +0000

yep, not cool.

By: Charles Perry

Charles Perry — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:03:10 +0000

Before someone corrects me…I am fully aware of the failsafe return-to-home feature on these.

Google DJI Phantom Failure if you think these things are reliable…

By: Guy

Guy — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:49:44 +0000

Corey sucks.

By: Charles Perry

Charles Perry — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 20:49:27 +0000

Flying r/c rotorcraft directly above people is a seriously boneheaded move.

There are many possible points of failure on these multirotor machines (transmitter, receiver, flight controller, speed controller, battery, motor, propeller, propeller adapters).

Given that this is only a 4 rotor machine, there is no redundancy in the case of a malfunction. If any one of those components fails…that thing is gonna come crashing out of the sky like a rock onto the people below.

It may look like a toy, but even a plastic propeller spinning above 10,000 rpm is capable of doing some serious damage.

The ease of flying these new generation of multicopters has brought a new crop of people to the hobby who unfortunately have more money than sense.

If you want to find out what kind of damage these are capable of inflicting on flesh, check out this rcgroups thread (not for the squeamish).

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1144377&page=2

By: kurtz

kurtz — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:59:22 +0000

“too”, not “to”. Fuck, I hate the internet.

By: kurtz

kurtz — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:58:28 +0000

Get over yourself Corey. If every person filmed wanted a cut of advertising revenues, youtube wouldn’t be in business. Also, it’s a linked vid to youtube, so actually MissionMission’s not liable.

Good luck with that whole firing a projectile into the sky at a flying personal video device and not being charged with manslaughter if said projectile misses and strikes a human on it’s gravity-enhanced return to the surface. Falling bullets kill people to, dolt.

By: Corey Aberie

Corey Aberie — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:46:07 +0000

Ahhhhh–so is spying next on your agenda? Does someone have the right to shoot it out of the sky, if it is not sanctioned by law enforcement or has no FAA approval? Do the “participants”, especially those that are SAG members, qualify for a per diem for using their images, if you realize any profits from the showing of these clips?

By: RIP ears

RIP ears — Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:28:43 +0000

Why do people with all the cool toys have the worst taste in music and no ability to edit?