<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mission Mission &#187; please do not punch me in the nose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmission.org/tag/please-do-not-punch-me-in-the-nose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmission.org</link>
	<description>Saluting San Francisco&#039;s Mission District</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Four bikes, two locks</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/29/four-bikes-two-locks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/29/four-bikes-two-locks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Sarkarati</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[please do not punch me in the nose]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmission.org/?p=33871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stakes have been raised once again!  This clever use of geometry takes the previously-featured 2 bikes, 1 lock formula to the next power by exponentially increasing the parties involved.  While not necessarily as efficient as the aforementioned 3 bikes, 1 lock solution, this nonetheless makes for quite the sidewalk spectacle.  Which one gets the grand [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.missionmission.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/4-bikes-2-locks.png"><img class="alignnone size-large wp-image-33872" title="4 bikes 2 locks" src="http://www.missionmission.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/4-bikes-2-locks-560x844.png" alt="" width="560" height="844" /></a></p>
<p>The stakes have been raised once again!  This clever use of geometry takes the previously-featured <a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/08/24/two-bikes-one-lock/">2 bikes, 1 lock</a> formula to the next power by exponentially increasing the parties involved.  While not necessarily as efficient as the aforementioned <a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/07/three-bikes-one-lock/">3 bikes, 1 lock solution</a>, this nonetheless makes for quite the sidewalk spectacle.  Which one gets the grand prize for bike lock ingenuity?  I will leave that to you, gentle reader.</p>
<p>Of course, one thing is for sure:  This is way better than <a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/21/2-bikes-no-lock/">2 bikes, no locks</a>!  No way I&#8217;ll be able to teach any lessons in this case&#8230;</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://corntard.com/post/13469603236/4-bikes-2-locks" target="_blank">Corntard</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Previously:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/08/24/two-bikes-one-lock/">Two bikes, one lock</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/07/three-bikes-one-lock/">Three bikes, one lock</a></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/21/2-bikes-no-lock/">Two bikes, no lock</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/11/29/four-bikes-two-locks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
