<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mission Mission &#187; Roger Ebert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmission.org/tag/roger-ebert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmission.org</link>
	<description>Saluting San Francisco&#039;s Mission District</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hitchcock Thinks the Mission is SF&#039;s &#039;Skid Row&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/hitchcock-thinks-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/hitchcock-thinks-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 19:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vic Wong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life in the Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skid row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vertigo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s the rather obscure Vertigo snippet that Roger Ebert alluded to yesterday. So there you have it, in 1958 the Mission was considered &#8220;Skid Row&#8221;. Either that, or Hitchcock was a total wuss. In any case, we&#8217;re renaming the blog to &#8220;Skid Row Skid Row&#8221;. Mock Duck posted a higher quality .mov of it in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/S7xWl6_hYfk" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the rather obscure <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertigo_(film)">Vertigo</a> snippet that Roger Ebert <a href="/2010/05/03/ebert-thinks-that-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/">alluded to yesterday</a>. So there you have it, in 1958 the Mission was considered &#8220;Skid Row&#8221;. Either that, or Hitchcock was a total wuss. In any case, we&#8217;re renaming the blog to &#8220;Skid Row Skid Row&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://mockduck.wordpress.com/">Mock Duck</a> posted a higher quality .mov of it in the <a href="http://40goingon28.blogspot.com/2010/05/two-views-of-endup.html">original thread</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Previously:</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><a title="Permanent Link: Ebert Thinks the Mission is SF’s ‘Skid Row’" rel="bookmark" href="/2010/05/03/ebert-thinks-that-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/">Ebert Thinks the Mission is SF’s ‘Skid Row’</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/04/hitchcock-thinks-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ebert Thinks the Mission is SF&#039;s &#039;Skid Row&#039;</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/03/ebert-thinks-that-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/03/ebert-thinks-that-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vic Wong</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missionmission.wordpress.com/?p=13784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh Ebert, you mostly get it right, but sometimes you get it so, so wrong. 40 going on 28 has the scoop. Update: BK says, &#8220;He’s making a reference to the film &#8216;Vertigo,&#8217; in which there’s the line, &#8216;The Mission? That’s Skid Row, isn’t it?&#8217;&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Endup is on 6th [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://40goingon28.blogspot.com/2010/05/two-views-of-endup.html"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-13785" title="ebert" src="http://www.missionmission.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ebert.jpeg" alt="" width="100%" height="auto" /></a></p>
<p>Oh Ebert, you <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY0ypTc7Gaw">mostly get it right</a>, but sometimes you get it so, so wrong.</p>
<p><a href="http://40goingon28.blogspot.com/">40 going on 28</a> has <a href="http://40goingon28.blogspot.com/2010/05/two-views-of-endup.html">the scoop</a>.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">Update:</span></strong> BK says, &#8220;He’s making a reference to the film &#8216;Vertigo,&#8217; in which there’s the line, &#8216;The Mission? That’s Skid Row, isn’t it?&#8217;&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t change the fact that <a href="http://www.theendup.com/">Endup</a> is on 6th and Harrison, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionmission.org/2010/05/03/ebert-thinks-that-the-mission-is-sfs-skid-row/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
