<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mission Mission &#187; stuff that&#8217;s not art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.missionmission.org/tag/stuff-thats-not-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.missionmission.org</link>
	<description>Saluting San Francisco&#039;s Mission District</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 18:47:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Department of Public Works defines what is and isn&#8217;t art</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2014/01/14/department-of-public-works-defines-what-is-and-isnt-art/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionmission.org/2014/01/14/department-of-public-works-defines-what-is-and-isnt-art/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 01:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel Dovas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graffiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[show me your tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuff that's not art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweets on blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is art]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmission.org/?p=51809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art is a tricky thing to define. As we all know. Or maybe we don&#8217;t. I find it a lot easier to recognize what is art than what isn&#8217;t. Today I got into a debate with a Twitter account for DPW&#8217;s Zero Graffiti program. What strikes me the most about Zero Graffiti SF&#8216;s argument here [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art is a tricky thing to define. As we all know. Or maybe we don&#8217;t. I find it a lot easier to recognize what <em>is</em> art than what <em>isn&#8217;t</em>. Today I got into a debate with a Twitter account for <a href="http://sfdpw.org/index.aspx?recordid=66&amp;page=1414" target="_blank">DPW&#8217;s Zero Graffiti program</a>. What strikes me the most about <a href="https://twitter.com/zerograffitisf" target="_blank">Zero Graffiti SF</a>&#8216;s argument here is the implication that acknowledging that something is art is to condone it or qualify it in a positive way. I understand that the city doesn&#8217;t want people tagging where they&#8217;re not supposed to (pretty much everywhere), but I wonder why they won&#8217;t call it art. Or rather, why they specifically decide to say that it&#8217;s not.</p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>
Why can&#8217;t it be both? Saying it&#8217;s art doesn&#8217;t condone it. “<a href="https://twitter.com/zerograffitisf">@zerograffitisf</a>: Tagging Is Not Art; It’s Property Damage <a href="http://t.co/oacGoMHe9T">http://t.co/oacGoMHe9T</a>”</p>
<p>— Ariel Dovas (@eviloars) <a href="https://twitter.com/eviloars/statuses/423151652925763584">January 14, 2014</a>
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/eviloars">@eviloars</a> difference between art and vandalism? permission. If you have permission, you have art; if not, you have vandalism &#8211; simple</p>
<p>&mdash; Zero Graffiti SF (@zerograffitisf) <a href="https://twitter.com/zerograffitisf/statuses/423228770619633665">January 14, 2014</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" lang="en"><p>.<a href="https://twitter.com/zerograffitisf">@zerograffitisf</a> So Banksy&#39;s not art? Even if his vandalism is worth the price of the building it&#39;s on? Art doesn&#39;t have to be asked for.</p>
<p>&mdash; Ariel Dovas (@eviloars) <a href="https://twitter.com/eviloars/statuses/423235217764012032">January 14, 2014</a></p></blockquote>
<p><script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script></p>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>
.<a href="https://twitter.com/zerograffitisf">@zerograffitisf</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/cynthia_says">@cynthia_says</a> No, art can be vandalism, art can be illegal. Not that plain, not that simple.  <a href="http://t.co/1qWBrCPC8u">http://t.co/1qWBrCPC8u</a></p>
<p>— Ariel Dovas (@eviloars) <a href="https://twitter.com/eviloars/statuses/423239826473644032">January 14, 2014</a>
</p></blockquote>
<p><script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionmission.org/2014/01/14/department-of-public-works-defines-what-is-and-isnt-art/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drippy art is in</title>
		<link>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/21/drippy-art-is-in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/21/drippy-art-is-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ariel Dovas</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life in the Mission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuff that's not art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telephone poles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.missionmission.org/?p=26185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/eviloars/5639499457/in/photostream/lightbox/" title="Drippy Art Is In by eviloars, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5147/5639499457_25a9e3e587.jpg" width="281" height="500" alt="Drippy Art Is In"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.missionmission.org/2011/04/21/drippy-art-is-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
