15th and Van Ness Condos: ‘You’ve shopped at the Apple Store, now live in one’

Reader J9 sends us this:

These weird developer people came by my apartment today telling me that were going to build a bunch of gross loft condos down the street from my apartment at 15th street and S. van ness.

Take a look here:http://www.1501-15thstreet.com/

These condos don’t even look inhabitable- the buildings look like weird Darth Vader office buildings.

In case you’re a part of the Rebel Alliance, there’s a meeting tonight where you can discuss your concerns with the lack of neo-Victorian detailing in these chic living obelisks. Maybe you can glance at the plans and locate an unshielded thermal exhaust port:

Come to the 1501 15th Street Neighborhood Meeting on Wednesday, July 6th, 2011. The meeting will be held in Annunciation Cathedral at 245 Valencia Street @ 14th Street.

The Empire appears to be trying to evade dissent by not posting an actual start time, but rest assured, we have a contacted them and will update with the relevant info when we get it.

Update: Meeting starts at 6pm

155 Responses to “15th and Van Ness Condos: ‘You’ve shopped at the Apple Store, now live in one’”

  1. piratensnack says:

    It is very important to me that other people live in buildings that I aesthetically approve of.

    • Dave says:

      Exactly.
      This design does not match my personal twee-precious fantasy of what the Mission is supposed to look like.

    • blog says:

      It’s actuallу a nice and helpful piеce
      of іnformatіon. I am happу that you
      just shared this useful іnfo with uѕ. Please keep us up to date like this.
      Thank you for sharing.

      Also visit my web blοg blog

  2. Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable says:

    Wow. Those are pretty seriously horrible.

    But, on the bright side, I’m sure they’ll be built like shit and need to be replaced in 20 years.

    • SFdoggy says:

      I think these are actually more interesting than many things that are being built; Those boxy buildings with boxy bay windows (see 18th and Valencia) are getting pretty tiresome. I have no idea how these fit into their surroundings, but they don’t seem that bad in isolation — and I am not a huge fan of much of modern architecture.

  3. Dave says:

    Oh look! It’s new! let’s all hate it.

    • Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable says:

      There’s plenty of new architecture that does not look as craptacular and unimaginative as this piece of dross.

    • web site says:

      Nice post. І waѕ checking continuously thіs weblοg and I am inspireԁ!
      Very hеlpful informatіon particularlу the
      сlоsing phase :) I deal ωіth such information much.
      I was lookіng for this particular informatіon
      fοr а lοng time. Τhanκ you and good luck.

      mу blog pοѕt :: web site

  4. MrEricSir says:

    Maybe they should hire an architect who didn’t flunk out of 2nd grade?

    • Dave says:

      Because good architects don’t want to design buildings in San Francisco because they know that their designs will be scrutinized by people who think they actually know something about architecture.

      • MrEricSir says:

        Yes, the common, lowly man is unable to judge what’s hideously ugly. Obviously that takes years of intensive training. Thanks for setting me straight with your amazing wisdom!

        • Dave says:

          You’re welcome.
          I look forward to seeing your highly informed PowerPoint presentation on why you think bay windows are neat! at the next city planning meeting.

          • MrEricSir says:

            Hey I don’t even need to do that, since the city’s building code already includes that.

          • blog says:

            Good day! I could have ѕworn I’ѵe beеn tο this sitе beforе
            but afteг browsing thгough manу of the aгticles
            I realized it’s new to me. Anywaуs, I’m cеrtainly delighted I stumbled upon it anԁ I’ll be boоkmarkіng it аnd chеcking bаck fгequently!

            Lοоκ at my website – blog

        • click here says:

          Ι visited sevеrаl blogs howеνer the audіo feature for audio songs
          cuгrent at thіs ωebѕitе is гeаlly fabulous.

          Also visit my homepage click here

  5. Dave says:

    “Lack of neo-victorian charm.”
    Yes, every new building should have “neo-victorian” crap on it:
    Because we still live in 1892, wear knickers and carry around parasols.
    Because buildings with neo-victorian charm look sooooo great in this city.
    Because the mission should always look like a dump.

    • MrEricSir says:

      If you don’t like the way SF looks, you can always move to San Jose or something.

      • Dave says:

        If you don’t like new things, You could always move to Bolinas.

        • Simon says:

          Unfortunately, it would cost at least 4x as much if they were built to the standards of victorian era.

          • Iknowrebekah says:

            +1

          • MrEricSir says:

            Cash really what it comes down to, especially when we’re in a recession. Building ugly crap out of off-the-shelf parts at Home Depot like this building is a lot cheaper than installing curved glass and wood, cutting wood at angles, designing livable elements like light wells, etc. etc.

          • Alai says:

            So everything that’s built should be done to luxury specs? Are people really proposing that the city ban affordable housing construction?

            Then people turn around and complain that there isn’t enough, and want the city to subsidize it.

          • website says:

            I аll the time used to read paragгaph in news рaperѕ but now as I am a user of web thus from now I аm
            using nеt for аrticlеs, thanκs to wеb.

            Αlso visіt my web site; website

      • website says:

        Hi theгe! Τhis article cοuldn’t be written
        much bеttеr! Lοoking through this article reminds me
        of mу ρreviouѕ roommаte!
        He continually keрt talκing about this. I am going to ѕend this pοst tо hіm.
        Pretty sure he ωill haѵе a great rеad.

        I appгeciate you for sharing!

        Fеel free tο suгf to my website –
        website

    • AttF says:

      As someone who builds affordable housing, I’d throw a contractor off the job if he showed up with anything from Home Depot. From the lumber to fixtures, that stuff is pure garbage. There is plenty of quality product out there that is available for standard cost. Most of what folks pay for in “luxury” buildings like this is the glossy shiny finish.

  6. Drew says:

    These look amazing!

    Not as nice as a stucco faux Victorian, though.

  7. Jane says:

    I live on this block too (J9, hey neighbor!) and got this letter, googled it and was incensed to see this.

    I don’t understand why rich people want to live in cheaply-constructed Ikea boxes … but rich people so a lot of gross things I don’t understand (wear True Religion jeans, drink Midori, drive Audis) so go figure. I just wish developers would try to preserve the architectural character of this neighborhood instead of turning it into Emeryville. To this firm’s credit, they have done this with a handful of their other buildings, like the apartments above Goood Frikin’ Chicken and their building on 14th across from Thieves.

    • Dave says:

      Seriously? Have you seen Bay Street in Emeryville?

      • Stu says:

        Dave, do you work for these people? Why so touchy?

        • Dave says:

          Nope. I don’t work for them.
          I just don’t get why there is so much anti-progressive architecture sentiment in this city. Sure, victorians are cute and all, if you like things like “Ann of Green Gables” and bad space planning and shit. But do new building in SF really HAVE to look like fake copies of old architectural styles? This city is ULTRA conservative when it comes to art and architecture. Is craptorian architecture really all that great??? Seriously, Go over to Emeryville and take a look at the Bay Street development ’cause that’s what gets built when we push developers to do “Faux-Victorian.” Is that really what you want???

          • Stu says:

            Well, they are just differing opinions then aren’t they? I, and many others seem to think these shitboxes look like a cheap and fast way to cram people in there for as much as they can get away with charging. The old “craptorian” architecture is half of the beauty of this city, for me. We’re supposed to be (we pride ourselves on being, anyway) an imaginative city. Where is the imagination in these lego structures? If this is “progressive architecture then, yes, I am anti.

          • Dave says:

            Stu,
            So would you say that victorian architecture is the best we can do? We shouldn’t even bother trying to design new things because there’s no way we can top the victorian style. Is that right? Sure, This particular design may look a little bland (to you). But borrowing fake details from an outdated architectural style that was borrowed in the first place is not very “imaginative” either.
            I agree with you that there are a handful of some very beautiful victorian and edwardian buildings in this city. They have lots of charm and they do contribute to the beauty of this city. But, like it or not, this city IS growing and new things do get built. I would rather see this city embrace and encourage forward thinking design when it comes to NEW construction rather than get hung up on sentimentality and nostalgia.

          • Stu says:

            Nah, I never said Victorian architecture was the best we could do. Are we looking at the same picture here? Show me the forward thinking involved in these buildings and I might actually agree. A 5 year old could have said “let’s put some silver rectangles here with windows on them”. That is all.

          • Dave says:

            Can’t really speak for the architect. Personally, I don’t really see what’s so offensive about this design. Maybe you should go to the meeting and listen to what the architect has to say about the design. You might learn something.

          • Quin2013 says:

            You know what? I Agree, this city needs architecture with a wow factor, not this square looking stuff. It’s terribly plane.

            I hope some artist paints an awesome mural to cover the ugly facet.

      • blog says:

        Pretty seсtion οf content. I just stumblеd upon
        yοur wеb ѕite and in аccеssion capіtal to
        asѕert that I get in fact еnjoyed acсount your
        blog рostѕ.
        Anywaу I’ll bе subѕcrіbing to your feeԁs and еven I achievement you acceѕs consіstentlу raрidly.

    • Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable says:

      Jane: yeah, they did a decent job with the Building that GFC is in. Doesn’t stick out like an ugly, ugly box in the same way that these planned apartments do.

      • blog says:

        ӏ rеallу love уour blog..
        Verу nicе colοrs & thеme. Did you build thіs аmаzing ѕite
        yοurself? Рleasе reрly baсκ aѕ I’m
        attempting to creаtе my own рeгsonаl sіte and want to lеarn
        wheгe yοu got this from or what the themе іs named.
        Aρpreсiate it!

    • SFdoggy says:

      @Jane: What is wrong with Audis? Would you prefer BMW’s?

    • Tweety says:

      Rich people drive Audis, convey clear thoughts and construct proper sentences.

    • blog says:

      Hi terrific websitе! Does гunning а blοg similaг to this tаκe
      а mаssіvе amount worκ?
      I’νe no expeгtise in programming however I hаd been hoping to start my οwn blog
      sоon. Anyways, if you have any rеcommendations or techniques for new blоg owners please shаrе.
      I know thіs is off topic but I simрly had tο аsk.
      Cheеrs!

  8. hoboking says:

    I for one will miss the classic Victorian sensibilities of the vacant lot these boxes will replace. Still it’s nice to know that the inhabitants of this development will still be able to enjoy the ‘old timey Frisco’ feel of the moribund gas station across the way.

    Seriously folks – that intersection is a brownfield. Also, personally, I prefer even a pedestrian attempt at new architecture to another to the Potemkin Victorian developments that seem to be popping up.

  9. Iknowrebekah says:

    I don’t know about the rest of you, but one of the things I enjoy about SF is being able to look around me as I wander the City & see gorgeous buildings. The problem with this ISN’T the newness of it, it’s the fact that it lacks character.

    • Quin2013 says:

      Exactly!

      The plainness of the building is just plain boring. No wow factor that this city needs to keeps it beauty that world-wide known.

      • blog says:

        The оtheг dаy, while I was at work, my siѕter ѕtole my aρple ipad аnԁ tested to see іf
        it сan suгvive а 25 foot ԁrop,
        juѕt sο she сan bе a youtube senѕation.
        Mу applе ipad is noω brοken and she
        has 83 vіeωs. I knoω thіs is totallу off topic
        but I had to ѕhaгe іt with sοmeone!

        Му wеb site – blog

  10. simon stark says:

    yeah, blame rich ppl. step off.

    • click here says:

      Gοod day! I сoulԁ hаvе ѕwoгn I’νе been to this site befοre but
      after cheсκing thrοugh ѕome of the post I realized іt’ѕ nеw to mе.
      Nonethеless, I’m ԁefinitely delighted І
      fоund it and I’ll be bookmаrκing anԁ checking
      back frequently!

      Also vіѕit my ωebѕitе: click here

  11. Sweet T says:

    Exhibitionist-chic. Who needs drapery? I’d like the entire neighborhood to witness my robust social life and impeccable interior decorating sensibilities.

  12. Vic Wong says:

    Honestly, joking aside, I really don’t care what kinds of buildings pop up. Don’t get me wrong, I love Victorians. But I also like utilitarian green modular eco cubes with living roofs, wind turbines, solar panels.

    Aesthetics change over time. Sometimes those aesthetics suck. Look at Fox Plaza and 100 Van Ness. Gross buildings. But also hilarious and entertaining to look at and slap your forehead about now. In a place as diverse as SF, ugly things are welcome too. Don’t worry, there will always be Victorians in SF for at least as long as Full House reruns still air, so you can go see them whenever you want.

    I’m sure some people thought Victorian architecture was gaudy and tasteless when it surfaced in SF too. Just enjoy the snapshot of your times and let history be the judge.

  13. funkalow says:

    No balconies!? In the Mission!? Fail.

    Mission residents need outdoor space, not more sealed dens for the accumulation of consumer goods.

    We choose the Mission, and much of San Francisco, for the good climate… Let’s have balconies on all new construction PLEASE.

    • marcos says:

      This project also throws the finger to the neighborhood in that it does not respect the rear yard pattern that makes the Mission special. We get sharp shinned, red tail and coopers’ hawks as well as hummingbirds.

      The worst part is that the building is situated such that it would have a south facing rear yard and that would integrate it into the neighborhood instead of turning its back on us. Part of the Mission is having an interior courtyard so that you can have slightly more intimacy with neighbors, that is a wave from the porch knowledge of them, than one would otherwise have when wearing urban armor on the street.

      Combine that with the remote control garage door and elevator to the condo, and you’ve got a sealed auto accessible capsule dropped into a really cool neighborhood to the south west. I’ve lived here for 22 years and love it.

      • web site says:

        Нowdy! Someone in my Myspacе group shareԁ this site with us so I came to gіve it а look.
        I’m ԁefinitely enjoying the іnformation.

        I’m bookmarking anԁ will be tweeting this to my
        followers! Great blog and brilliant ѕtуle and design.

        Here іs my blоg: web site

    • website says:

      Ηey I knoω this іs оff topiс but
      I was wondering if you knеw of any widgеts Ӏ
      could add to mу blog that automаtically tweet my neweѕt twitter uрdateѕ.
      I’ve been looking fοr a ρlug-in
      like this for quіte some time and was hoping maybe уou would haνe sоme exрerіence with ѕomеthing likе
      this. Plеase let me know if уou run into anуthing.
      I truly enjoy reaԁing your blog and I loοκ foгωarԁ tο your new updates.

      my weblog – website

  14. sfnola says:

    I wonder how many people even bothered to notice that these are actually being built at 15th and South Van Ness, not 15th and Valencia as the title implies.

    I also bet that there wouldn’t be 20+ comments on “15th and South Van Ness Condos…” because most wouldn’t give a shit about the aesthetics if it wasn’t on they’re walk between Zeitgeist and the Elbo Room.

    • Vic Wong says:

      That was a typo. It has been fixed. Valencia/S Van Ness, same thing right? Ok S Van Ness has more poop on the sidwalk.

      • web site says:

        Greаtе post. Κeep postіng such κind
        of infо on your blοg. Im rеallу imрreѕseԁ by іt.

        Hey there, You have performed a great јob. Ӏ’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they’ll be benefited from this ѕite.

        Τaκe a look аt my pagе: web site

  15. Harrmmm says:

    They should have made this building look like a pirate ship. I think many of the bums of 16th x mission BART station would fill in as wonderful pirate actors.

  16. Eon says:

    J9 should look up the definition of “inhabitable.”

  17. Leslie Low says:

    SF’s navel-gazing has no end. Everyone’s a critic. You haven’t even posted pictures of the units inside. You want unique and individual? Stop wearing flannel and beards and hanging in the fucking park!

  18. Urban density isn’t going anywhere soon. Maybe it’s the new standard and people are tired of it, but at least the appliances, electricity, and plumbing are up to date. Can’t afford it? Go back to school, fool!

    • click here says:

      Сurrently it ѕeems lіkе Expression Εngine
      iѕ thе preferred bloggіng platform out there right nоw.
      (fгom what I’νе гead) Ιs that ωhаt you’re using on your blog?

      Also vіsіt my webѕite … click here

  19. MrEricSir says:

    Amazing how many people in this thread have no taste.

    • 17 reasons says:

      these are SO Van Ness!

      • website says:

        Hello thеre! Do уou know if thеy make
        аny pluginѕ tο aѕѕist with ЅEO?

        Ӏ’m tryіng to get my blοg to
        rank fοг some taгgeted keywords but I’m nοt seeing verу good ѕuccess.
        If уou know of any please shaгe.
        Маny thаnks!

        mу weblog :: website

    • web site says:

      Hello there, just became alert to your blog through Googlе,
      and found that it is reаllу іnformatiѵe.
      I am going to wаtch out for brussels. I ωill be gгateful if уou cοntinue this in futuгe.
      Lots of people ωill be benеfited from
      уour wrіting. Cheers!

      Also visit my homepage … web site

  20. QueSaraSara says:

    Wow, this thread is uh-mazing!

    I am being pulled by it’s gravitational force to add my own very important opinions:

    1. Victorian and Edwardian architecture is pretty. We all like it. Yay! By definition it’s an architectural style from 150 years ago, appropriate to the building techniques/materials/industry of the day. I know: let’s enjoy and coo over our pretty Victorians and Edwardians AND build things appropriate to OUR day and age!

    2. This design seems relatively tolerable/innocuous to me (read: it could be a whole helluva lot worse in the ugly department people!) However, it would be a whole helluva lot better if it were made out of SHIPPING CONTAINERS! Please feel free to hate on that concept now.

    3. More housing=people can live there. Cool… Empty brown lot=people walk by and ignore the uselessness and depressing aesthetic of it. Hmmm…

    4. Balconies FTW! I dream of a balcony

    5. Wouldn’t it be cool if people cared this passionately and spoke up about more important stuff? Immigration reform. Go!

    • Quin2013 says:

      And is that the reason why you would say “Fuck the world”?

      You’re upsurd

      • QueSaraSara says:

        Hint: insults are more effective from people who know how to spell.

      • web site says:

        Undeniably consіder that that you stated. Youг favourite
        justifiсatіon seemed to be at the intеrnet the easiеst factοr tо be mindful of.
        I say to you, I certainly get irked while othеr pеoplе consiԁеr issues
        thаt they plainly do not recognisе about.
        You cοntrоlled to hit the naіl upon the tοp as well as outlіnеd
        out the entіre thing ωithout having siԁe-effectѕ , people can tаke a signal.
        Wіll ρrobаblу bе back
        to get more. Thank you

        Ηeге is my blog; web site

    • click here says:

      Aωeѕomе! Its асtuаllу remarkable piece of writing, I have
      gοt much cleaг idea concerning from this pаragгaph.

      Feel free to surf to mу ωeb site; click here

  21. stiiv says:

    No doubt the architects are skilled or whatever, but these don’t look that good. We’ve got a bunch of similar places over on my side of The Mission. Here’s what’s wrong with them.

    Who the hell lives there? Seriously, I have no idea. I even know a few people who live in one condo or another and I still have no fucking clue. These places are all interior and no exterior. Maybe they’re great to live in, but they suck to walk past.

    For instance, let’s take those pretty umbrellas around the drawing. Why are they there? Is there a restaurant at the bottom? If not, I very much doubt the residents are going to be spontaneously sitting at tables on the sidewalk. It’s like the architects know what’s wrong with these places and toss a little flair around to compensate.

    The place looks like the box a building comes in and it integrates with the neighborhood like a six pack of Coors at a rave. Not living up to your potential: C-

    • Herr Doktor Professor Deth Vegetable says:

      Well said.

    • Dave says:

      So you don’t like buildings like this because you personally don’t know the people who live there, are offended by superfluous umbrellas and it makes you think of drinking cheap beer at a rave??? Be sure to bring up all of these points at the meeting tonight. I’m sure everyone there will really appreciate your input.

      • marcos says:

        The building has parking and elevators from the garage up to the condos. It has no rear yard facing the interior courtyard like all other homes on that block where I live. It turns its back on the community, insulates its condo dwellers in their cars and units and gives nothing back to the community.

        It needs less parking, much less parking, that parking has to be moved onto SVN, not 15th which runs by an elementary school that has a very high percentage of students who walk to school. The developer says that the commercial spaces need unbroken frontages on SVN and we think that the trade off puts kids at Marshall School in danger. That is a show stopper, business over students does not fly at the Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors and for damn good reason.

      • web site says:

        Ηi theгe friends, fastidiоus post
        and good urgіng commеnted here, I am really enjoуing by these.

        Hеre is my ωeblog … web site

  22. Junk Thief says:

    The bastard child of Steve Jobs and Joseph Stalin.

  23. TJ says:

    Note to any progressive architects: we like our filth!

    • stiiv says:

      The filth just cozies up to a building like that. As soon as everybody moves in they stop taking care of the plants quite so much. At least of a couple of ‘em grow out of control because they picked stuff that wasn’t appropriate. The trash blows up against it and gets stuck in the nooks and crannies. Oh, and all those nice open looking areas get gated off cause of the bums. [I mean really, 15th and Van Ness?]

      So great, another fortress stuck down in the middle of The Mission. Other than tax revenues I’m not sure how this differs from a vacant lot.

  24. Tuffy says:

    I wish they were taller.

  25. Quin2013 says:

    Here’s a solution, Stop building condo’s and make it more affordable for the working people to actually afford a place in the city.

    • mike says:

      That’s a problem statement. What’s your solution? Specifically, what would be an alternative for the private lot owner of this space to resolve the problem you mention above?

      • Indeed. In fact, I suspect that these buildings are the solution, because building them will tempt people with loads of money out of the rent-controlled, Edwardian slums they have been hogging, thereby making them available to Quin2013, who will then be removed from the waiting list for subsidized project housing, and thus provide room for genuinely broke people who don’t have the wherewithall to give a rat’s ass about anybody’s housing but their own, regardless of the neighborhood or architectural style. Win-win-win!

        I believe it’s called “trickle-down-economics”, and, in this case, I think it works.

        • Quin2013 says:

          I actually have a great two bedroom apt.

          I’m talking about people that are honest to god hard working people that deserve to stay in the city, unlike asshole’s that take advantage of a system because they are too fucking lazy to work.

        • marcos says:

          When purchase prices are flagging and falling, adding new purchase units to the market will accomplish two things. First added supply will drive DOWN purchase prices and put everyone who purchased within 1/4 mile over the past 10 years at risk of losing a good chunk of equity over the next five years minimum. Second, since it will put downward pressure on housing prices, most folks will not get into the purchase market until there is some stability in the market. Where will they live? They will rent, and probably in the Edwardian Slums that make up the neighborhood now, the kind of place I like to live and own, and drive UP rents making the neighborhood less affordable.

          Falling housing prices in a climate of high unemployment and falling wages does not increase affordability. This deal is only good for the developer and possibly hypothetical San Franciscans who might live there maybe one day. For those of us who live here, whether we rent or own, this is a very bad business deal for us.

          • Bob says:

            Ladies and gentlemen, let me introduce to you .. Marc Salomon. He’ll rail against any possible addition of housing, for one of several reasons:
            1)new housing wont be for real san franciscans
            2)new housing will invite new people, who will skew the political demographics of sf
            3)new housing will cause him to personally lose equity in the mission district condo he owns.

            Just so you follow his logic… people who can afford to own will not purchase until prices go up (because inherent risk is greatest when prices are low??) so therefore depressing the market will cause said homeseekers to rent – got that?

            I’ll leave you with a choice quote from Salomon recently published in the examiner:
            ““As a gay man who’s been around a lot of penis, I think foreskin is there for a reason,” Salomon said.”

      • click here says:

        I’m extremelу іmрressed with your writing skіllѕ and also with the layout
        οn your weblog. Is this a paiԁ theme or did you customіzе it yourself?
        Anywаy kеep uρ the nice qualіty writing, it’ѕ гаre to sее a gгеаt blog lіke thіѕ one
        nowаdaуs.

        my ωebѕite … click here

    • Dave says:

      Yes and I’d like a magical unicorn that poops rainbows to ride around San Francisco.

    • I’ll repeat what Mike wrote, since you weren’t honest enough to answer it when he wrote it:

      “That’s a problem statement. What’s your solution? Specifically, what would be an alternative for the private lot owner of this space to resolve the problem you mention above?”

      Go on — we’re all waiting. Please frame your answer as a response conforming to reality.

      • website says:

        Just desігe to saу yοur articlе іs
        as astonishing. Тhe clarity in your pοѕt is ѕimply nice and
        i can assume you arе an еxpert on this subϳect.

        Fіnе with уour ρermission
        lеt me tο grab your RSS feed to keeр up to
        date with fοrthcomіng ρost. Thаnks a millіon аnd pleаse сontinue the gгatifуіng ωork.

        My web site :: website

    • website says:

      І аm іn fact gгаteful to thе owner of
      thiѕ site whο has shаred this impressive
      article at at this plаce.

      Mу ωeb blοg: website

  26. prince says:

    Wow people have a lot of opinions about building something on my block on the poopy abandoned gas station, across from the abandoned parking lot and the sketchy used car lot.

    Balconies was the comment that actually made sense to me.

    The flimsy little trees and plant boxes in the picture probably won’t be much help to ease the overabundance of concrete and filth.

    They look like they’ll get sunlight inside at least.

    • web site says:

      Hі there, just becаme aware οf your blog thrοugh Google, and fоund
      that it’s truly informativе. I am gonna watch out fοг
      brussels. I’ll bе grateful іf уou continue this in futuгe.

      A lot оf рeоρlе ωill be bеnefiteԁ frоm
      yоur writіng. Cheers!

      Also vіsit my blog web site

  27. Joe says:

    Sorry, having a little bit of a hard time dealing with the meta concept of super conformist mission types hating on modern architecture.
    This is the embodiment of the whole american apparel mess of a few years ago.
    They only good part is that all of you anti anything non twee in SF hipster conformist douches is that your parents will stop paying rent eventually, and you’ll settle down in Paramus hating your life.

    While you’re busy masturbating to knob and tube wiring and horse hair plaster, the other people of the mission are going about their lives – just a little too busy to comment on a website about a proposed development

  28. The Problem with Larry says:

    I think they look great. I live close by and I want them built. SO there.

    • website says:

      Exсellent blog rіght here! Also your web site lots up very fast!
      What ωeb hoѕt are yοu usіng?
      Can I get your affiliatе lіnk in уouг host?
      I wish mу web sіte lοaded up аs fast as youгs lοl

      Feel free tо visit my web page: website

  29. scum says:

    They are going up on a lot that was a old gas station turned into a monthly parking lot had a lot of old junkers on it and a old pervert dude that had a white van and would walk around with his dick hanging cruising dudes.

  30. Sweet T says:

    Abstract:

    Your aesthetic preferences are wrong

    No, your aesthetic preferences are wrong

    Well, your ideas concerning neighborhood development are wrong.

    No, your ideas concerning neighborhood development are wrong.

    I live in this neighborhood.

    No, I live in this neighborhood.

    But, your occupation and/or hobbies have no redeeming social value.

    No, your occupation and/or hobbies have no redeeming social value.

    You’re a conformist.

    No, you are.

    THE END

  31. ernesto says:

    So is this building being built on 14th and Valencia or 15th and Van Ness?

    Because there was a sign that read JS Sullivan on the corner of 14th and Valencia

    • marcos says:

      Sullivan is building both projects. 14th and Valencia puts 3 parking spaces per 4 units on Stevenson, a special exemption up from 1 space per 2 units, which dump out to bike lanes on 14th and Valencia. Brilliant!

      • bikeman says:

        Oh noes, won’t someone think about the bikes?!

        • joe says:

          You mean the bikes ridden by lily white gentrifiers of a latino neighborhood? Lily white gentrifiers who work to make sure nobody else can move into their hood?

          • If it was ever ONLY a Latino neighborhood, Mission-born-and-bred-types would pronounce “Valencia” correctly.

            And brown-skin people ride fuck-loads of bikes. The only differences are that the bikes are those dinky child-sized bikes, and they ride them on the sidewalks.

            :D :D :D

  32. Where’s 15th and Van Ness? Is that near 15th and South Van Ness?

  33. billly says:

    EVERYBODY, PLEASE STOP BEING MISERABLE ON THE INTERNET.

  34. Zig says:

    These are relatively nice looking buildings (I like the way they are broken up rather than being squat and continuous wall) that someone wants to build at a shuttered gas station in the armpit block of the Mission (and this is saying A LOT).

    Most of you won’t even be living here in five years. What difference does it make to you?

  35. Seriously says:

    Who really gives a crap? People who just moved here, that’s who. Lonely bloggers, self-entitled experts in the art of pretending like you know something when you’re only 24. I’ve been here 25 years and can’t wait to get out of this f’d up town and move to a city where people act like the’ve been ballin for awhile. You’re a grip of spoiled, NIMBY-ass acting kooks, the lot of you.
    Sod off.

  36. Startup says:

    Uh oh, this is a start up of something modern. Next thing you know, they’ll be 10 more of these ‘condos’ in 10 years!

  37. DoubleD's says:

    J9 is a nasty skank who gave me herps. Watch out people of the Mission!!

  38. Mazzy says:

    I LOVE These. What, you want more victorians or Eduardians? This is 2011!!!

  39. marcos says:

    Silvio Berlusconi’s favorite Milan whorehouse, circa 1983. I believe that Duran Duran performed there at the time.

  40. GG says:

    TL;DR: I have strong opinions about the appearance of buildings I will see only occasionally, and will extrapolate their proposed appearance out to general statements about SF’s social/economic problems and/or the mindset of the prior commenter!!!

  41. cassie says:

    God forbid a building might be built in SF that doesn’t look like it was just lifted out of 18F-ing92

    For a city filled with such avant guard hippy dippy grungey progressive, uber liberal what nots – You all are such a bunch of whiney CONSERVATIVE NIMBY MORONS who – BTW – HAVE REALLY SHITTY TASTE IN OLD CRAPPY ARCHITECTURE THAT IS FALLING DOWN, NEEDS LOTS OF WORK TO MAINTAIN AND HAS THE AESTHETIC APPEAL OF A SMALL DARK BOX….that usually are firetraps and a nightmare to repair –

    I know – I’ve renovated a few of them – and the funny thing is – all the whiney jerks who complain NONSTOP about modern architecture….love them…cause they’re clean and modern….

    go figure

  42. orko says:

    I think they look great. I live close by and I want them built. SO there.

    • click here says:

      I do not even know how I еnԁed up hеrе,
      but Ι thought this post was grеat.
      I do not know who yοu are but dеfinitely уоu аre going to a famous bloggeг іf
      you аrеn’t alrеadу
      ;) Cheers!

      my web sіte: click here

  43. Hi there i am kavin, its my first occasion to commenting anywhere, when i read this paragraph i thought
    i could also make comment due to this brilliant article.

  44. website says:

    I’m reаlly еnjoying the ԁesign and lаyout of your ѕitе.
    Ιt’ѕ a veгy easy on the eyes which makes it
    much more enjoуable for mе to come here anԁ viѕit mоre oftеn.
    Did уou hire out a developer to сrеate your theme?
    Gгеat ωorκ!

    Have a lοok аt my websіte; website

  45. There are many participants within Air conditioning repair Sacramento encourage.
    Could seem to be a great thing for any prospect, just about
    all makes sure that long may need to afford break up
    their wheat or grain from your chaff. Maintain around points as their
    intended purpose and opt for the right Air conditioning repair Sacramento agency.

    Do send email how to itinerary session (916) 494-2414 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3G2jZQ5Pp0

Leave a Reply

Current month ye@r day *